Expert: The Impact of Texas’ $745 Million Investment in Mental Health

Erin Peavey (Courtesy of: HKS)

Texas state lawmakers just wrapped up the 86th legislative session, and as a part of their work, they approved $745 million for the construction of mental health facilities specifically designed to improve the lives of Texans receiving treatment.

That’s an investment our country desperately needs. In the United States, nearly one in five adults live with mental illness, and almost one in 20 experience severe mental illness. It is clear mental health is an issue that should get our collective attention.

However, Texas ranked third to last in the nation in mental health care spending per capita in 2013 — the most recent year for which data are available. And, as of last year, it had the greatest shortage of mental health providers of any state.

Given this, it’s no surprise that Texas’ mental health infrastructure is in poor shape. The good news is that legislators have taken notice. There are four large construction projects underway, including San Antonio State Hospital and Rusk State Hospital. Those two hospitals will supply 500 inpatient psychiatric beds. These facilities will better reflect how our state values human life.

For many people, state-run psychiatric units can conjure up painful images. Communities have long stigmatized mental illness and underfunded treatment. But as mental healthcare paradigms are changing, so are the facilities where the care takes place.

These new facilities emphasize recovery instead of acting simply as emergency housing for people experiencing a mental health or behavioral crisis. They are designed to fit better into the communities where they are located to make transition to outpatient care easier, and they focus on the health, safety and welfare of all who live and work there.

As we have worked with the compassionate and diligent leadership at Texas Health and Human Services, we’ve distilled powerful takeaways for the design of all mental and behavioral health facilities. These arose from team dialogue, national guidelines for mental health and environmental psychology research that focuses on how the environment impacts human health.

  1. Facilitate recovery: One of the core tenants of the National Alliance on Mental Illness is recovery. Design and planning can help facilitate this by providing opportunities for patients to engage in therapeutic experiences and practice life skills in a safe, supportive environment. This may include special programs for arts and music, or programs around reintegrating into their communities – including cooking, cleaning, and caring for oneself. Additionally, the grounds themselves can help reduce stress, provide phased levels of family and community integration and support the care model.
  2. Stigma reduction: The stigma of mental illness is a primary roadblock to patients and families in seeking treatment. The hospital’s design and performance plan should be carefully crafted to avoid any appearance that reminds families of their potential negative associations with a public psychiatric hospital. Creating a deinstitutionalized environment that honors the person is an important step in reducing stigma. In practice, this means creating a welcoming entry, using artwork and décor to help it feel more homelike and finding ways to support privacy and choice as possible. Having a place that is well-maintained can increase pride in the environment and reduce further property destruction.
  3. Safety and security: Plan and design an environment that reduces stress and that staff can manage. The units must make patients feel and be safer and minimize the risk of patients harming themselves or others. Our approach seeks to provide patients with the freedom they can handle and staff with the tools they need to keep patients secure. Patients should have access to a variety of therapeutic outdoor spaces to promote behavioral improvement and reduce violent incidents.
  4. Flexibility as a resource: Flexibility is increasingly a project driver in a changing mental health environment. The facility design should be able to accommodate different care models than originally planned or provide services to different groups of patient types.
  5. Staff recruitment and retention: Staff shortages are a major concern for health systems. A facility with well-designed areas that are safe, secure and attractive can increase recruitment and retention. The design should include areas of respite for staff and create an environment that improves their workflow.

As we look to the future of care for those suffering from mental illness in Texas, we must keep these things in mind. We must also measure the impact of design interventions on clinical and financial outcomes to inform future projects as design for mental and behavioral health takes center stage in Texas and across the United States. Although our nation has a long way to go, it is comforting to know that we are investing in a future more conducive toward recovery.

Erin Peavey is an architect and design researcher at HKS. She also serves as research chair and a trustee for the Academy of Architecture for Health Foundation.